UV absorbent green solar control glass composition

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides an UV absorbent green solar control glass with low UV transmittance composition having a soda-lime-silica glass composition, wherein the coloring compounds comprises in weight percentage: from 0.50 to 1.30% of total iron expressed as Fe 2 O 3 ; from 0.12 to 0.45% of FeO expressed as Fe 2 O 3 ; from about 0.04 to 1.8 wt. % TiO 2 ; about 0.20 to 2.0% wt CeO 2 ; about 0.0004 to 0.0015 wt. % CuO; and about 0.010 to 0.10% C. The glass composition having a redox value (FeO/Total Fe 2 O 3  from 10 to 35%.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A. Field of the Invention

The present invention refers to a glass composition for the commercialproduction of an UV absorbent green solar control glass with low UVtransmittance composition having a soda-lime-silica glass composition,wherein the coloring compounds comprises in weight percentage: from 0.50to 1.30% of total iron expressed as Fe₂O₃; from 10 to 35% of ferrous;from 0.12 to 0.450% of FeO expressed as FeO; from about 0.04 to 1.8 wt.% TiO₂; about 0.2 to 2% wt CeO₂; about 0.0004 to 0.015 wt. % CuO; andabout 0.01 to 0.1% C.

The green solar control glass with low UV transmittance compositionhaving an illuminant “A” light transmission (TL_(A)) greater of 70%, atotal solar energy transmittance (Ts ISO13837) of less than or equal to60%, and a solar ultraviolet transmittance (Tuv 1509050 v1990) of lessthan 15%; a dominant wavelength from 485 nm to 570 nm; and excitationpurity of less than 11, for thickness form about 3 to of 5 mm.

B. Description of the Related Art

Several patents have been developed for obtaining green glass, for“automotive” purposes, having a light transmission greater to 70, whichmeets with the requirements of the U.S. Federal Motor Vehicle SafetyStandard. For the construction industry there is not restriction andsmaller values can be obtained as well as thicknesses between 1.6 and 12mm.

The glasses disclosed in almost all the prior patents referring to atype of green glass for automotive purposes, are based on three basiccomponents: iron oxide titanium oxide and chromium oxide as well.Similarly, it is highly desirable that the glass have the necessaryabsorption properties to absorb damaging infrared (IR) and ultraviolet(UV) solar light, so as to reduce the excessive heating within thevehicles on sunny days, and to protect the interior of the vehicle fromthe degradation caused by ultraviolet radiation. Also, it is well-knownthat ultraviolet rays (UV) are responsible for causing extensive damage,including initiating skin cancer development and causing fading offurniture and flooring.

Many of the transmission characteristics of the glass of differentwavelengths can be controlled by adding several absorbent coloringagents in the initial glass batch. Consequently, for vehicleapplications, it has been desirable to use colorants to produce a glassthat is able to filter a large portion of the damaging ultraviolet raysfrom the sun, lower than 39% (measured in the wavelength of .lamda.300-400 nm and air mass 2 or less than 35% in the same wavelength rangewith air mass equals 1.5), but that permits the largest possible visibleamount (of the luminous rays) up to 70% or more. Together with thetypical formulation of a soda-lime-silica glass, constitutes the basiccomposition of the glass. That is the case of the glasses of the U.S.Pat. No. 6,030,911 of Scheffler-Hudlet, et al, issued on Feb. 29, 2000,which has glass redox value from 0.202 to 0.237% of FeO; another U.S.Pat. No. 6,350,712 of Cabrera, issued on Feb. 26, 2002 in which ironoxide, titanium oxide and chromium oxide are used as main components.The titanium oxide compound is present in an amount of 0.0 to 0.30 wt. %and about 0.01 to 0.03 wt % of chromium oxide.

Several patents have been developed for obtaining colored glass, using astandard soda-lime glass base composition. For automotive use it ishighly desirable that the glass have a high level or percentage ofvisible light transmission, in order to provide the driver a goodvisibility of his surroundings, thus, complying with the norms ofautomotive safety. As well, it is highly desirable that the glass havethe necessary absorption properties to retain or absorb damaginginfra-red (IR) and ultra-violet (UV) solar light, so as to control theaccumulation of heat in the interior of vehicles, which will result in areduction in power consumption needed for the automotive airconditioning equipment and for the vehicles themselves.

Also, it is well-known that the transmitting characteristics of theglass of different wavelengths can be controlled by adding severalcoloring agents in the initial batch glass composition. Consequently,for automotive applications, it has been desirable to use colorants toproduce a glass that is able to filter a large portion of the damagingultra-violet rays from the sun, lower than 39% (measured in thewavelength of 300-400 nm), but with the highest possible visible amount(of the luminous rays) up to 70% or more.

The iron is generally present in the glass as a ferric oxide, impartingto the glass a clear green color. The spite of that, within the glasscomposition, the total amount of iron present is found to comprise bothferric oxide Fe₂O₃ and as ferrous oxide FeO since, even when pure ferricoxide is used in the basic raw materials during the glass meltingprocess, a portion of the ferric oxide is reduced and is transformedinto Ferrous oxide.

Normally, the total quantity of iron in the glass and its amount offerrous oxides are expressed as being based on Fe₂O₃. It is alsostandard in this industry to express the quantity of ferrous or ferricoxide as a percentage of the total iron, namely:

$\%\mspace{14mu}{Fe}^{+ 2}\mspace{14mu}({FERROUS})\mspace{14mu}\frac{{FeO} \times 100}{{Total}\mspace{14mu}{Fe}_{2}O_{3}}$

$\%\mspace{14mu}{Fe}^{+ 3}\mspace{14mu}({FERRIC})\mspace{14mu}\frac{{Fe}_{2}O_{3} \times 100}{{Total}\mspace{14mu}{Fe}_{2}O_{3}}$

The iron oxides (ferric and ferrous) impart different optical propertiesto the glass, the total quantity of iron present and its equilibrium asferric or ferrous have a direct impact on the color, light transmissionand absorption of infrared and ultraviolet radiation. The ferric oxideabsorbs ultra-violet energy (low transmission level), and at the sametime it has a high level of light transmission, and of infrared energytransmission and it possesses a tenuous yellow-yellow greenish color.

By contrast, ferrous oxide absorbers infrared energy (low transmissionlevel), has a high level of ultraviolet transmission, and a lower levelof light transmission and possesses a more intense blue color.

Therefore, the greater the quantity of Fe₂O₃ present in the glass, thegreater will be the absorption of ultraviolet radiation, and the lighttransmission is increased but, as the contents of FeO is increased as aresult of the chemical reduction of Fe₂O₃, the absorption of theinfrared radiation will increase, but the absorption of the ultravioletradiation is decreased and the light transmission is also (undesirable)decreased.

On the other hand, the greater the concentration of FeO in relation toFe₂O₃, results in a change in the color of the glass. The shift toward ahigher concentration of FeO in relation to the Fe₂O₃ causes a change ofcolor of the glass from a yellow or yellow-green to a darker blue-greensometimes undesirable, because it reduces the light transmission of theglass.

Therefore, in order to manufacture a glass with determined propertiesand color, one must have the correct proportion of Fe₂O₃ and FeO, takinginto account that what is increased on the ferrous side, will diminishon the ferric one, and consequently one must arrive at a compromise ofproperties since improving (lowering) the value of one property willworsen (rise) the value of the other properties.

In order to increase the absorption of the infra-red- and ultra-violetradiation without sacrificing the transmission of the visible spectrum,it is necessary to lower the total content of the iron which is highlyreduced from ferric to ferrous, to less than 0.70% of total ironexpressed as Fe₂O₃.

Depending on the state of reduction of the glass, the coloring changesas follows:

Low ferrous (12%)-yellow-high light transmission (high ferric)yellow-green

green-yellow

green (desirable)

green-blue

blue-green

blue

High ferrous (75%)-amber-low light transmission (low ferric)

Additionally, it is known that the oxides of titanium, molybdenum andthe cerium, principally of cerium, also are colorants, and when they areused in combination with the Fe₂O₃, it is possible to obtain anadditional reduction of the ultraviolet light transmission to a pointwhere the sought for visibility transmission is achieved. It does,however, suffer from the disadvantage of its high cost, which makes theformulation more expensive, and has a tendency to oxidize the iron toFe₂O₃.

In addition, while the use of CeO₂ in quantities from 0.1 to 0.5%provides absorption of ultra-violet radiation, it has the disadvantagethat it tends to change the most desirable green color, to anunacceptable yellowish hue.

In order to control the reduction of the glass formulation, metallictin, stannic chlorides, and mainly coal, have been employed as reducingagents, introduced them in the charge. Coal is used in a finely dividedstate in an amount of 0.01 to 0.06%, preferably 0.025% of the totalamount of the batch.

In order to maintain a constant ferrous value and conserve the greencolor of the glass, the amount of coal required to counter the oxidizingeffect provoked by the introduction of 1% cerium oxide in a typicalglass with a low content of iron, is within the range of 0.9 kilogramsper ton of glass. Pursuant to the opinion of some researchers in thefield, this level of coal interferes with the humidification action ofthe silica of the saline cake and, therefore, it results in theformation of silica slag in the melting furnace.

Similarly, in order to maintain the ferrous value constant, thuscounteracting the oxidizing effect, of a constant amount of cerium oxideis added as the content of iron in the glass increases. For example, upto 0.80% of total iron added, it was foreseen that the same amount ofcoal should be added due to the fact that the level of cerium oxide isconstant, or that the requirement of coal should be much greater due tothe fact that the equilibrium of the ferrous value would lessen with thegreater addition of iron.

Many papers have been published on colored glass compositions withinfrared and ultraviolet radiation absorbing characteristics. W. A. Weylin the book Coloured Glasses, Society of Glass Technology, reprinted1992, describes diverse theories of colour in glasses related to thecurrent views of the structure and constitution of glass. The use ofchromium and its compounds for coloring glasses is described in saidbook. In the glass industry the chromium is added to the raw materialsto obtain a color emerald green which is typical of Cr³⁺. The chromiumcan be present as Cr⁶⁺ as Cr₄O₂ to obtain a lightly yellow color and asCr²⁺ through which the emerald green is obtained.

C. R. Bamford, in the book Colour Generation and Control in Glass, GlassScience and Technology, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Amsterdan,1977; describes the principles, the methods, and the applications aboutthe coloration of glass. In this book the author considers that threeelements govern the color of the light transmitted by a glass, namely:the color of the incident light; the interaction of the glass with thatlight; and the interaction of the transmitted light with the eye of theobserver. The procedures require the spectral transmission data of theglass at the relevant glass thickness and the relevant angle of viewing.

K. M. Fyles in the paper Modern Automotive Glasses, Glass Technology,vol 37, February, 1996, pp 2-6, considers that the iron is the mostimportant colorant in modern automotive glasses since it is the onlycheaply available component which absorbs harmful ultraviolet radiation(ferric iron) and also absorbs a large proportion of the infrared(ferrous iron).

Werner Vogel in the book Chemistry of Glass; The American CeramicSociety, Inc. 1985, consider that in general the colorless glass presentan absorption in the UV region for base glasses. For example the glasseswith a longer transmission in the UV are the phosphate glasses, silicaglasses, boron glasses, germanium glasses, etc.

Gordon F. Brewster, et al, in the paper “The color of iron-containingglasses of varying composition”, Journal of the Society of GlassTechnology, New York, USA, April, 1950, pp 332-406, is related to thecolours changes caused by systematic composition variations iniron-containing silicate and silica-free glasses evaluated in terms ofvisual colour, spectral transmission and chromaticity.

Other papers also describe the importance of the equilibrium betweenferrous and ferric oxides in glasses such as the one written by N. E.Densem; The equilibrium between ferrous and ferric oxides in glasses;Journal of the Society of Glass Technology, Glasgow, England, May 1937,pp. 374-389″; “J. C. Hostetter and H. S. Roberts, “Note on thedissociation of Ferric Oxide dissolved in glass and its relation to thecolor of iron-bearing glasses”; Journal of the American Ceramic Society,USA, September, 1921, pp. 927-938.

Finally, the paper “Effects of Titanium Dioxide in Glass” by M. D.Beals, The Glass Industry, September, 1963, pp 495-531, describes theinterest that has been shown the titanium dioxide as a constituent ofglasses. The effects produced by the use of titanium dioxide includedthe comments that TiO₂ greatly increases the refractive index, increasesthe absorption of light in the ultraviolet region, and that is lowersthe viscosity and surface tension. From the data on the use of titaniumdioxide in enamels, they noted that TiO₂ increases the chemicaldurability and acts as a flux. In general, clear glasses containingtitanium dioxide may be found in all of the common glass-forming systems(borates, silicates, and phosphates). The various regions of glassformation for systems containing titanium dioxide are not grouped in anyone place, since the organization of the discussion is based more on theproperties and uses of glasses containing titanium dioxide than on theirconstitution alone.

On other hand, some others glasses disclosed in other patents that havebeen developed for obtaining colored glass, using a standard soda-limeglass base composition, such as those mentioned in the followingparagraphs use, different metallic elements as titanium, chromiumconferring the characteristics to the final product, that allow them aTLA>70%, in order to be used in the automotive industries.

The U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,536 by Pecoraro, et al, claims a transparentinfrared absorbing glass having at least 0.45 percent by weight ironexpressed as Fe₂O₃, forming a glass into a flat glass product. Theoxidation-reduction conditions are controlled in a stage of theproduction process and in subsequent stages so as to yield a glasshaving at least 35% of the iron in the ferrous state expressed as FeOand which when formed into a flat glass product of suitable thicknessexhibits the combination of luminous transmittance of at least 65% and

U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,133 by Cheng, claims a glass having a final infraredtransmittance of no more than 15%. composition that includes 0.51% to0.96% of Fe₂O₃, 0.15% to 0.33% of FeO and 0.2% to 1.4% of CeO₂, whereinthe percentage by weight of FeO, represents a percentage reduction ofthe total iron, expressed as Fe₂O₃, from 23% to 29%, so that the glasshas an illuminating wavelength of C, from 498 to 525 nanometers (nm) anda hue purity of 2% to 4%

In order to obtain the latter, U.S. Pat. No. 5,112,778 also Cheng,indicates that the redox reaction is balanced between the ferric andferrous oxides, the cerium oxide and the coal in a soda-lime-silicaglass, changes to a state of a greater reduction when the content oftotal iron is increased up to a 0.05% to a 0.8%, The reason for whichthe ferrous value increases instead of decrease, a situation that wasexpected. Consequently, in order to change the reduction state so as toobtain the same ferrous value found in the lesser concentration of thetotal iron, the quantity of coal added to the smelting furnace, whichhas a total content of iron, must be diminished, a statement which iscontrary to the teaching of the prior art, i.e. it will require lesscoal for a high content of total iron in the formulation of thesoda-lime-silica glass.

The main disadvantage of the glasses described in the Cheng patents isas already been mentioned, they necessarily include the CeO₂ as an agentto control the reduction for the formulation, mainly the Fe₂O₃. Anotherdisadvantage of the use of cerium oxide as a required component is thehigh cost as a raw material.

Finally, another known ingredient present in the soda-lime-silica glassis sulfuric trioxide (SO₃). Sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄) is added to the rawmaterials batch of the glass as a refining agent at a high temperature,which is used principally as an agent for bubble elimination, andpromotes mass transport, attacks free silica at the surface of the glassand lessens the number of solid inclusions.

On the other hand, the sodium sulfate has oxidizing properties, which isthe reason why normally small amounts of carbon are added to themixture, in order to prevent oxidation and at the same time lower thetemperature of reaction.

During the manufacture of the glass, the Na₂SO₄, which is the maincontributor of sulfur in the glass, converts into SO₃, which controlsthe conversion of the Fe₂O₃ into FeO. However, the SO₃ present in thefinal glass does not affect the ability of the glass to transmit visiblelight.

The amount of SO₃ dissolved in the glass decreases if it has:

1. A lesser quantity (proportion-wise) of the sodium sulfate.

2. Greater melting properties

3. Greater melting times.

4. A furnace environment that has greater oxidation action.

5. Greater reduction of the iron to ferrous oxide (greater Fe²⁺; lesserFe³⁺) arriving at a minimum of 70-75% of the Fe²⁺.

Therefore, the quantity and effects of the SO₃ in the glass batch has tobe balanced in accordance with the amount of carbon present in the glassbatch.

Furthermore, it is a common knowledge that SO₃ in the glass batch mustto be within certain critical quantities because lesser amounts of SO₃in the glass batch will affect the refining properties, i.e. the abilityto eliminate bubbles in the melting furnace.

It is upon these bases that the U.S. Pat. No. 5,214,008 by Beckwith andU.S. Pat. No. 5,240,886 by Gulotta who claim, respectively, a greenglass having the property of ultra-violet radiation absorbance, whichcontains 0.7% to 0.95% of total iron, approximately 0.19% to 0.24% ofFeO and approximately 0.20 to 0.25% of SO₃ (in the absence of CeO₂), anda green glass of ultra-violet radiation absorbance with a total ironcontent greater than 0.85%, a content of CeO₂ less than 0.5%, and arelation to the FeO/total iron of less than 0.275%. The Gulotta's patentdescribe that the glass reduces the amount of costly cerium oxiderequired to yield low ultraviolet transmittance, viz, no greater than31% (300 to 390 nanometers) at a reference thickness of 3.9 millimeters.

In both the Beckwith and Gulotta patents, the FeO present in relation tothe total FeO/Fe₂O₃, is found to be ferrous and is not transformed tothe ferric type, as is done by the inventors of the present invention.

Other example of a colored glass composition is disclosed in U.S. Pat.No. 5,308,805 by Baker, et al, which describes a neutral, generallygreen-gray low transmittance (no more than 25 luminous transmittance)soda-lime-silica glass, which has a reduced solar energy transmittance,which contains 1.3% to 2% of Fe₂O₃ (total iron) 0.01% to 0.05% of NiO;0.02% to 0.04% of CoO; and 0.0002% to 0.003% of Se; 1.3% to 2% of Fe₂O₃.The glass has a ferrous value in the range of 18 to 30.

In the U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,845 by Boulos, et al, it is described a greensoda-lime-silica glass composition having excellent ultravioletabsorbing ability while having a relatively high light transmittance.The colorants of the glass composition consist essentially of: greaterthan 0.5% to 1.5% of total iron oxide as Fe₂O₃; wherein the weight ratioof Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ is less than 0.35%; 0.10 wt. % to 2.00 wt. % manganesecompound as MnO₂; and optionally any of: up to 1.00 wt. % titanium oxideas TiO₂, up to 1.00 wt. % cerium oxide as CeO₂; up to 1.00 wt. %vanadium oxide as V₂O₅; and up to 0.20 wt. % chromium oxide as Cr₂O₃;the glass composition having, at 4.0 mm thickness; 55 to 80% lighttransmittance using Illuminant A with less than 46% ultraviolettransmittance measured over the range of 300 to 400 nanometers.

The U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,812 by Shelestak, et al, describes a greencolored glass using a standard soda-lime-silica glass base compositionand additionally iron, cerium, chromium and, optionally, titanium asinfrared and ultraviolet radiation absorbing materials and colorants.Preferably, the glass has a green color characterized by a dominantwavelength in the range of about 500 to 565 nanometers with anexcitation purity of no higher than about 5% and includes about 0.50 to1.0 wt. % total iron, about 0.26 to 0.65 wt. % Fe₂O₃, about 0.05 to 3 wt% CeO₂; 0 to about 2 wt. % TiO₂, and about 20 to 650 PPM Cr₂O₃. Theredox ratio for the glass is maintained between about 0.20 to 0.55 andpreferably between 0.20 and 0.30. The glass compositions disclosed inthe present invention have an LTA of at least about 65%, preferably atleast 70%, a TSUV of no greater than 38%, preferably no greater than35%, a TSIR of no greater than about 35%, preferably no greater thanabout 30%, and a TSET of no greater than about 60%, preferably, nogreater than about 45%.

The Shelestak's patent uses the oxides of titanium and mainly cerium, ascolorants, and when they are used in combination with the Fe₂O₃, it ispossible to obtain an additional reduction of the ultraviolet lighttransmission to a point where the sought for visibility transmission isachieved. It does, however, suffer from the disadvantage of its highcost, which makes the formulation more expensive, and has a tendency tooxidize the iron to Fe₂O₃.

In addition, while the use of CeO₂ in quantities from 0.05 to 3.0%,provides absorption of ultraviolet radiation, it has the disadvantagethat it tends to change the most desirable green color, to anunacceptable yellowish hue.

In order to convert the FeO to ferrous oxide, expressed as ferric, it isnecessary to multiply the same by the factor of 1.111358.

Furthermore, as it can be clearly appreciated from the above patents, inorder to express the visible light transmission characteristics of aglass, it is necessary to take into account the following three mainitems:

1. The thickness at which it is measured, since the transmission of UV,visible light and infrared decline in direct relation with the increaseof the thickness of the glass.

2. The wavelengths of the different zones, for example the UVtransmission is considered to be from 300 to 400 nm (ISO 13837convention A); from 300 to 390 nm according to PPG's U.S. Pat. No.5,240,866; from 282.5 to 377.5 nm in ISO 9050 (1990); as well as if theincrements were from 2.5, 5 or 10 nm. Consequently, there will bedifferent values when measuring the ultraviolet transmission for thesame product.3. The standard used in respect to the solar energy, should beestablished beforehand, for example: “CIE PUBL:” 40; and the air mass,Perry & Moon Air Mass=1, Air Mass=2, or Air Mass=1.5 as used in therecent ISO 13837 standard. It should be mentioned that the addition ofNa.sub.2SO.sub.4 as a source of SO.sub.3 in the glass, is already wellknown, and that some U.S. patents such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,755,212 and4,792,536 already mentioned the content of SO₃ in quantities of 0.29%and 0.02%, respectively, the range of SO₃ as been between 0.20% and0.25% in the glass of the U.S. Pat. No. 5,214,008 is considered criticaland is a limitation on the scope of that patent.

Additionally, the U.S. Pat. No. 7,094,716 by Boulos added both ceriumand titanium oxides, the component of MnO_(z) in order to provide a moreadvantageous ultraviolet absorbance and a way to adjust color to theglass.

On the other hand, it is well known by the persons skilled in the art,that the addition or substitution of one or more colorants for othercolorants, or the change in the relative proportional amount in theglass composition, affects not only the color of the product, as forexample the dominant wave length of the color or the excitation purity,but also the luminous transmission, the heat absorption and additionalproperties such as the transmission of ultraviolet and infraredradiation.

It has been known that copper played an important role in the productionof colored glass, ceramics and pigments. It has been recognized, forexample, the coloration of the Persian ceramic for their tonalityconferred by the copper. Of special interest for ceramic artists are theturquoise blue and especially the Egyptian and Persian blue dark(Woldemar A. Weil; Colored Glasses, Society of Glass Technology, GreatBritain, p. 154-167, 1976).

Copper has been used in the glass compositions, not only in those ofsoda-lime-silica type, but also in others such as those containing, forexample, borosilicate. Therefore, the developed color depends on severalfactors, as the ones mentioned: the oxide base of the glass,concentration of colorants and also to its oxidation state.

For the case of the above mentioned glass as a base, the copper in theform of the oxide imparts a blue coloration of a greenish tone,specifically turquoise, however in the glass;

the copper can be in its monovalent state, which does not impart color.So, the blue greenish coloration depends not only on the amount ofcopper present, but on the ionic balance between the cuprous and cupricstates. The maximum absorption of the copper oxide is in a band centeredat 780 nm and a maximum weak secondary peak is present at the 450 nm,which disappears at high soda content (around 40% weight). (C. R.Bamford, Colour Generation and Control in Glass, Glass Science andTechnology, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, p. 48-50, Amsterdam,1977).

It has been verified that for industrial production is feasible to addCuO, in minor concentrations to 120 ppm for a glass thickness of 4.0 mmand less than 100 ppm for a glass thickness of 6.0 mm.

The glass also can be manufactured with a thickness from about 3.5millimeters to about 4 mm. If higher concentrations of CuO are presentedwithin of the float chamber, a reduction process in the atmosphere couldbe given, presenting a red coloration on the glass surface. This effectrelated with the residence time and to the advancing velocity of theglass ribbon can be intense and observable on the glass surface.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, there is provided a soda-lime-silicaglass composition, and a colorant portion, in weight, comprising: from0.50 to 1.30% of total iron expressed as Fe₂O₃; from 10 to 35% offerrous; and from 0.12 to 0.450% FeO of expressed as Fe₂O₃; from about 0to 1.8 wt. % TiO₂; from about 0.2 to 2% wt CeO₂; from about 0.0004 toabout 0.015 wt. % CuO; and about 0.01 to 0.1% C, wherein the glasscomposition having an illuminant “A” light transmission (TLA) greater of70%, a total solar energy transmittance (Ts 15013837) of less than orequal to 60%, a solar ultraviolet transmittance (Tuv ISO9050 v1990) ofless than 15%, a dominant wavelength from 485 nm to 570 nm, andexcitation purity of less than 11, to produce a glass suitable for usein automotive industry with a thickness from about 3 to of 5 mm.

It has been verified that for industrial production is feasible tomodify the range of Fe₂O₃, Redox, TiO₂ and CeO₂ mainly; and solarproperties, UV transmittance and color that are dependent on theconcentration. At the base formula also adjust the lower range of 2.1%MgO.

Also SO₃ from 0.10 to 0.25% in weight is maintained in the glasscomposition, without affecting the refining properties and ability ofsaid SO₃ to eliminate bubbles.

It is therefore the main objective of the present invention to provide agreen solar control glass composition which maintains its desirableproperties of transmission of visible light and of the absorption ofinfrared and ultraviolet radiation with optimized batch cost. Otherobjective of the present invention to provide a green solar controlglass composition wherein the level of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂, TiO₂ and C isoptimized to achieve good thermal performance in a glass sheet with anominal thickness of 3 to 5. 4 mm.

An additional objective of the present invention is to add lessexpansive substitute titanium oxide (TiO₂) by Ilmenite (FeTiO₃), asalternative raw material for the manufacture of the glass composition.

Is other objective of the present invention to reduce the ultravioletrays (UV) that are responsible for causing extensive damage, includinginitiating skin cancer development and causing fading of furniture andflooring.

These and other objects and advantages of the green solar control glasscomposition of the present invention will become evident to persons whohave knowledge in the field, from the following detailed description ofthe invention, in relation to a specific embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention will now be described in relation to a specificembodiment, wherein the amounts of the main components which arecritical for obtaining a green solar control glass composition with thedesired properties of visibility transmission and the absorption ofinfrared and ultraviolet radiation are set forth.

The typical composition of a soda-lime-silica glass used in theautomotive industry, and formed by the so-called glass float process, ischaracterized by the following formulation based on weight percentagewith regard to the total weight of the glass:

Components % by weight SiO₂ 70 to 75 Al₂O₃ 0 to 2 FeO 0.12 to 0.45 CaO 5 to 10 MgO 2.1 to 5   Na₂O 10 to 15 K₂O 0 to 3 SO₃ 0.10 to 0.25

The solar control glass composition of the present invention is based onthe above disclosed composition, to which the following coloringcompounds have been added:

Components % by weight Total iron (expressed as Fe₂O₃)  0.5 to 1.3 CeO₂0.2 to 2  TiO₂ 0.04 to 1.8 CuO 0.0004 to 0.015 Carbon 0.01 to 0.1

When the coloring compounds were added to the basic composition, a glasssheet with a thickness of about 3 millimeters to about 5 millimeters wasmanufactured, resulting with a low UV transmittance composition havingan illuminant “A” light transmission (TLA) greater of 70%, a total solarenergy transmittance (TS 15013837) of less than or equal to 60%, and asolar ultraviolet transmittance (TUV 1509050 v1990) of less than 15%; adominant wavelength from 485 nm to 570 nm; and excitation purity of lessthan 11.

It is common in the glass industry to refer the total iron content inthe glass composition or in the glass melting mixture, as the total ironexpressed as Fe₂O₃.

The combined weight of the FeO and Fe₂O₃ contained in the resultingglass composition will be minor, less than that fed during the melting,and less than the total of the initial iron used expressed as Fe₂O₃. Forthis reason, it is understood that the total iron is the iron expressedas Fe₂O₃, as it is used herein, as meaning the amount of iron fed in themixture before its reduction. And it is to be understood that thereduction value of the ferrous state is defined as the weight of theferrous oxide (FeO) expressed as Fe₂O₃ in the glass product, divided bythe weight percentage of total iron expressed in the form of reductionpercentage. The redox value FeO/total Fe₂O₃ for the present glasscomposition is from 10% wt. to 35% wt.

The physical properties such as light transmission correspond tocalculated variables based on internationally accepted standards. Sothat, the light transmission is evaluated using the illuminant “A”(TL_(A)) and standard Observer of 2 degree also known as of 1931 [C.I.E.Publication, 15.2, ASTM E-308 (1990)]. The wavelength range used forthese purposes is of 380 to 780 nm, integrating values in numeric formwith intervals of 10 nm. The solar energy transmission (Ts) representsthe heat which the glass achieves in direct form, evaluating it from 300nm to 2500 nm with intervals of 50 nm, the numeric form of calculationuses as recognized standard values those reported by ISO 13837 standard(air mass 1.5 300 a 2500 nm Trapezoidal intervals)

The calculation of the ultraviolet radiation transmission (Tuv),involves only the participation of the solar UV radiation, so that it isevaluated in the range of 300 to 400 nm of wavelength using intervals of10 nm and air mass equals 1.5 ISO 13837 convention A standard, from 280to 380 intervals of 5 nm Table 4 for ISO 9050 v1990 and from 300 to 380air mass 1.5 300 a 380 nm Trapezoidal rule for ISO 9050 v 2003 Table 3

The amount of solar heat which is transmitted through the glass also canbe calculated by the contribution of thermal energy with whichparticipates each one of the regions wherein the solar spectrum hasinfluence, which is from the ultraviolet region 300 nm, to near infraredregion 2500 nm, which is of 3% for UV, 44% for the visible and of 53% inorder for the IR, however, the values of the direct solar energytransmission, in the present invention, are calculated on the basis of anumeric integration taking into account the whole range of the solarspectrum of 300 to 2500 nm, with intervals of 50 nm and using the valuesof solar radiation reported ISO 13837 standard air mass 1.5 300 a 2500nm Trapezoidal intervals convention A.

The specifications for the determination of color such as the dominantwave length and the purity of excitement have been derived from thetristimulus values (X, Y, Z), which have been adopted by theInternational Commission of Illumination (C.I.E.), as direct result ofexperiments involving many observers. These specifications could bedetermined by the calculation of the three-chromatic coefficients X, Y,Z of the tristimulus values that corresponding to the red, green and theblue colors, respectively. The three-chromatic values were graphicatedin the chromaticity diagram and compared with the coordinates of theilluminant “D65” considered as illumination standard. The comparisonprovides the information in order to determine the color purityexcitement and its dominant wavelength. The dominant wavelength definesthe wavelength of the color and its value is located in the visiblerange, of the 380 to 780 nm, while for the purity of excitement, theless the value is, the nearest tends to be a neutral color. A deeperunderstanding of the topics can be obtained from the “Handbook ofColorimetry” published by the “Massachussets Institute of Technology”,of Arthur C. Hardy, issued in 1936.

The color variables L*, a*y b* of the color system CIELAB 1976, are alsocalculated through the Tristimulus Values.

The following are specific examples of soda-lime-silica composition inaccordance with the present invention, having corresponding physicalproperties of visible, ultraviolet and infrared radiationtransmittances, for a glass having a thickness of about 3 to about 5 mm.

TABLE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Fe₂O₃ 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15% Carbon 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 % TiO₂ 0.040.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 % CeO₂ 0.50 0.70 0.90 1.10 0.50 0.700.90 1.10 % CuO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Ferrous 17.314.3 11.3 8.1 34.4 30.4 28.3 25.6 Thickness (mm) 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.503.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 % Tuv (iso9050 v1990) 13.3 12.7 10.1 10.3 13.9 12.910.5 10.1 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 16.6 15.9 12.7 12.9 17.3 16.1 13.2 12.7% Tuv (Iso 13837) 29.4 29.3 25.8 26.7 29.0 28.7 25.2 25.1 % TL_(A) 75.277.4 78.3 81.8 61.1 64.8 65.3 66.5 % Ts (Iso 13837) 53.9 58.0 62.0 68.533.7 37.0 38.0 39.8 X 69.4 71.5 72.3 75.5 56.1 59.4 59.7 60.9 Y 76.378.0 78.5 81.6 63.9 67.4 67.4 68.4 Z 77.4 78.4 76.3 78.9 70.3 72.9 70.570.9 L* 90.0 90.8 91.0 92.4 83.9 85.7 85.7 86.2 a* −6.2 −5.3 −4.3 −3.7−10.9 −10.5 −9.8 −9.1 b* 3.4 4.0 6.0 6.4 −1.5 −0.5 1.5 2.0 X 0.31120.3136 0.3186 0.3201 0.2947 0.2975 0.3022 0.3042 Y 0.3420 0.3424 0.34560.3457 0.3357 0.3374 0.3411 0.3416 Dominant Wavelength 530.4 544.0 566.9573.8 488.3 490.3 496.6 499.9 (nm) % Purity 2.3 3.2 6.0 6.4 6.7 5.6 3.83.1

TABLE 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 % Fe₂O₃ 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.001.00 1.05 % Carbon 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.079 0.068 0.074 %TiO₂ 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 % CeO₂ 0.70 0.90 0.90 1.101.30 1.10 1.10 1.00 % CuO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.006 0.005 %Ferrous 26.4 20.8 20.8 19.9 18.1 27.6 22.9 30.1 Thickness (mm) 3.49 3.723.50 3.51 3.50 3.50 3.52 3.47 % Tuv (iso9050 v1990) 10.2 10.8 11.2 8.68.1 9.1 9.1 8.5 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 12.7 13.5 14.0 10.8 10.2 11.4 11.410.7 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 30.6 32.4 27.2 29.0 22.0 23.7 23.5 22.0 % TL_(A)66.3 68.9 70.0 69.8 71.2 67.8 71.8 65.3 % Ts (Iso 13837) 38.8 42.9 44.844.9 47.5 40.4 47.1 38.1 X 60.6 63.3 64.3 64.0 65.2 62.0 66.2 59.6 Y68.2 70.5 71.4 71.0 72.1 69.6 73.6 67.2 Z 69.9 72.2 73.2 70.5 70.4 70.672.2 68.6 L* 86.1 87.2 87.7 87.5 88.0 86.8 88.5 85.6 a* −9.3 −8.0 −7.6−7.6 −6.9 −9.0 −7.1 −9.6 b* 2.7 2.8 2.7 4.6 5.5 3.3 3.5 2.9 X 0.30510.3073 0.3078 0.3113 0.3140 0.3068 0.3122 0.3050 Y 0.3432 0.3423 0.34180.3456 0.3469 0.3441 0.3472 0.3439 Dominant Wavelength (nm) 504.2 509.3510.3 535.0 546.0 511.4 539.3 505.4 % Purity 3.0 2.4 2.3 3.6 4.6 2.8 4.23.0

TABLE 3 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 % Fe₂O₃ 1.05 1.05 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.740.72 0.72 % Carbon 0.063 0.067 0.070 0.070 0.070 0.070 0.090 0.090 %TiO₂ 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 % CeO₂ 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.901.10 1.30 1.40 1.50 % CuO 0.005 0.005 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.00400.0040 % Ferrous 20.7 23.7 31.3 27.0 26.3 23.9 27.7 27.9 Thickness (mm)3.57 3.54 4.76 4.76 4.80 4.84 4.83 4.95 % Tuv (iso9050 v1990) 10.1 9.612.8 11.6 9.8 9.4 8.6 9.0 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 12.7 12.0 16.0 14.5 12.411.9 10.9 11.4 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 25.1 24.1 29.2 28.0 25.6 25.6 23.6 25.1% TL_(A) 72.8 70.4 68.3 70.6 70.5 71.3 69.4 69.9 % Ts (Iso 13837) 47.344.4 40.2 43.4 43.4 45.1 42.2 42.5 X 66.9 64.5 62.9 65.0 64.8 65.6 63.764.2 Y 74.1 71.9 70.8 72.7 72.4 73.0 71.2 71.8 Z 74.8 72.8 76.4 76.875.7 75.2 73.7 74.2 L* 89.0 87.9 87.4 88.3 88.2 88.4 87.6 87.9 a* −7.4−8.1 −9.7 −8.6 −8.7 −7.9 −8.6 −8.8 b* 3.7 3.4 −0.3 0.9 1.6 2.4 2.1 2.2 X0.3100 0.3085 0.2993 0.3030 0.3043 0.3069 0.3053 0.3052 Y 0.3435 0.34360.3371 0.3388 0.3403 0.3414 0.3414 0.3416 Dominant Wavelength (nm) 525.8521.7 490.7 494.6 498.0 506.1 501.5 501.9 % Purity 2.7 3.1 4.9 3.5 3.12.4 2.8 2.9

TABLE 4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 % Fe₂O₃ 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.75 0.750.75 0.73 % Carbon 0.090 0.090 0.086 0.080 0.085 0.095 0.095 0.060 %TiO₂ 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 % CeO₂ 1.60 1.70 1.54 1.451.55 1.65 1.70 0.70 % CuO 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.00400.0040 0.0050 % Ferrous 22.4 22.1 23.2 24.3 25.6 30.5 28.1 22.1Thickness (mm) 4.88 4.95 4.86 4.83 4.95 4.88 4.95 4.98 % Tuv (iso9050v1990) 8.6 7.2 8.0 7.0 7.4 7.3 7.4 13.2 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 11.0 9.210.1 8.9 9.4 9.3 9.4 16.4 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 24.5 22.2 23.2 21.2 22.722.4 22.9 37.4 % TL_(A) 72.0 70.8 70.6 68.6 69.0 66.1 67.8 73.0 % Ts(Iso 13837) 46.4 46.2 44.9 42.8 41.9 38.2 40.0 47.2 X 67.3 66.1 65.462.7 63.1 60.4 62.0 67.3 Y 74.5 73.4 72.7 70.0 70.7 68.3 69.8 74.7 Z75.5 74.5 73.1 69.6 71.9 71.1 72.3 78.2 L* 88.6 87.9 88.0 87.0 87.3 86.286.9 89.3 a* −7.5 −7.2 −7.8 −8.4 −8.8 −10.1 −9.6 −7.6 b* 3.4 4.3 3.8 4.53.1 1.8 2.1 1.5 X 0.3096 0.3090 0.3097 0.3099 0.3068 0.3023 0.30380.3057 Y 0.3428 0.3431 0.3441 0.3461 0.3437 0.3419 0.3422 0.3392Dominant Wavelength 523.6 522.3 525.4 528.7 510.3 497.6 500.1 498.6 (nm)% Purity 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.4 2.7 3.7 3.2 2.6

TABLE 5 33 34 36 36 37 38 39 40 % Fe₂O₃ 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.730.73 0.54 % Carbon 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.063 0.066 0.069 0.079 %TiO₂ 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 % CeO₂ 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.700.80 0.90 1.00 1.00 % CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.00500.0050 0.0050 % Ferrous 25.9 25.0 22.9 27.7 22.8 25.5 26.2 25.8Thickness (mm) 4.93 4.83 4.89 4.88 4.90 4.90 4.90 4.80 % Tuv (iso9050v1990) 10.0 9.8 8.9 5.8 7.5 6.3 5.5 9.0 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 12.5 12.311.2 7.3 9.4 7.9 7.0 11.3 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 30.9 30.7 28.8 16.5 20.217.9 16.9 24.1 % TL_(A) 69.1 70.4 71.2 66.8 70.7 66.9 67.6 74.6 % Ts(Iso 13837) 42.4 43.7 45.1 39.3 44.7 39.8 40.6 50.4 X 63.3 64.3 64.959.7 63.6 61.7 60.8 68.5 Y 70.9 71.8 72.4 67.3 71.0 69.2 68.4 75.6 Z72.7 72.1 70.9 62.7 67.8 66.1 64.9 74.9 L* 87.4 87.9 88.2 85.7 87.5 86.686.2 89.7 a* −8.8 −8.4 −8.2 −9.8 −8.3 −9.0 −9.3 −6.9 b* 2.6 4.0 5.3 8.16.8 6.8 7.0 4.8 X 0.3059 0.3089 0.3119 0.3144 0.3143 0.3132 0.31320.3128 Y 0.3425 0.3449 0.3476 0.3549 0.3508 0.3514 0.3522 0.3453Dominant Wavelength 505.3 523.8 537.7 547.5 547.6 542.7 542.7 540.4 (nm)% Purity 2.7 3.1 4.2 7.1 5.9 5.6 5.8 3.8

TABLE 6 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 % Fe₂O₃ 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.72 0.720.72 0.72 % Carbon 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.080 0.070 0.070 0.070 0.070 %TiO₂ 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 % CeO₂ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 % CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0055 0.00550.0055 0.0055 % Ferrous 28.9 27.7 24.3 31.8 24.8 24.6 23.2 24.2Thickness (mm) 4.86 4.87 4.87 4.91 4.85 4.82 4.80 4.93 % Tuv (iso9050v1990) 9.2 9.4 8.8 8.1 8.9 8.3 7.4 6.9 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 11.6 11.911.1 10.2 11.2 10.5 9.4 8.7 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 24.2 24.7 23.5 22.0 23.822.7 21.0 19.8 % TL_(A) 72.4 72.9 73.7 70.5 70.4 70.8 70.2 69.1 % Ts(Iso 13837) 46.5 46.9 48.8 42.4 44.0 44.3 44.9 42.9 X 66.4 66.8 67.564.2 64.5 64.7 64.1 62.8 Y 73.8 74.3 74.8 72.1 71.9 72.2 71.4 70.3 Z74.3 74.7 74.0 71.5 72.6 72.0 70.1 68.4 L* 88.8 89.0 89.3 88.0 87.9 88.187.7 87.1 a* −8.0 −7.9 −7.3 −9.3 −8.2 −8.2 −8.1 −8.6 b* 3.8 3.9 4.9 4.63.6 4.3 5.2 5.7 X 0.3094 0.3096 0.3122 0.3088 0.3085 0.3099 0.31170.3118 Y 0.3443 0.3442 0.3458 0.3469 0.3440 0.3456 0.3474 0.3487Dominant Wavelength 524.3 525.3 538.3 525.3 522.0 528.1 537.0 538.1 (nm)% Purity 2.9 2.9 3.8 3.5 3.1 3.3 4.1 4.5

TABLE 7 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 %Fe₂O₃ 0.70 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.72 0.720.73 0.73 % Carbon 0.071 0.071 0.074 0.074 0.074 0.063 0.060 0.063 %TiO₂0.40 0.35 0.40 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 % CeO₂ 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.20 1.651.65 0.70 0.80 % CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.00500.0050 % Ferrous 22.7 25.3 26.3 25.4 20.9 22.3 24.3 25.8 Thickness (mm)4.87 4.90 4.81 4.92 4.89 4.90 3.47 3.50 % Tuv (iso9050 v1990) 8.2 8.37.0 7.6 6.7 7.3 10.2 9.6 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 10.4 10.5 8.9 9.6 8.4 9.112.7 12.0 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 22.7 22.9 20.6 21.7 18.1 18.8 32.0 23.6 %TL_(A) 72.6 71.1 70.6 70.3 71.5 70.5 75.4 73.7 %Ts (Iso 13837) 46.7 44.243.9 44.1 46.2 44.5 51.8 50.0 X 66.4 65.0 64.4 64.2 64.8 63.9 69.3 67.5Y 73.7 72.6 72.0 71.7 72.2 71.4 76.2 74.5 Z 72.8 72.8 70.9 71.5 67.266.8 75.2 72.3 L* 88.8 88.2 87.9 87.8 88.1 87.7 90.0 89.1 a* −7.7 −8.5−8.6 −8.4 −8.1 −8.6 −6.4 −6.7 b* 4.9 4.0 5.0 4.3 8.3 8.0 5.1 5.9 X0.3117 0.3089 0.3106 0.3096 0.3173 0.3160 0.3140 0.3151 Y 0.3463 0.34490.3473 0.3457 0.3536 0.3533 0.3455 0.3474 Dominant Wavelength 536.6523.7 533.0 527.1 552.9 550.0 546.0 549.7 (nm) % Purity 3.8 3.2 3.9 3.37.5 7.0 4.2 5.1

TABLE 8 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 %Fe₂O₃ 0.820 0.820 0.820 0.820 0.8250.825 0.825 0.825 % Carbon 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.0400.040 %TiO₂ 0.65 0.75 0.85 0.95 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 % CeO₂ 0.50 0.500.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 % CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.00500.0050 0.0050 0.0050 % Ferrous 23.1 23.3 22.7 22.4 22.1 15.2 15.4 24.2Thickness (mm) 3.40 3.53 3.52 3.52 3.55 3.56 3.56 3.56 % Tuv (iso9050v1990) 12.3 11.2 12.0 12.0 11.8 10.6 9.2 9.2 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 15.213.9 14.9 14.8 14.6 13.1 11.5 11.4 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 27.1 25.2 26.5 26.326.1 24.2 22.4 21.5 % TL_(A) 74.9 73.1 75.0 74.9 73.7 74.4 76.5 72.4 %Ts (Iso 13837) 51.3 49.5 50.9 51.1 50.5 56.8 57.6 47.7 X 68.8 67.0 68.868.6 67.6 68.4 69.9 65.8 Y 75.8 74.0 75.9 75.6 74.5 74.4 76.4 72.9 Z74.9 72.2 74.2 73.6 73.0 71.0 71.2 67.9 L* 89.8 88.9 89.8 89.7 89.2 89.190.0 88.4 a* −6.7 −6.9 −6.8 −6.6 −6.6 −4.7 −5.3 −7.3 b* 5.0 5.6 5.6 5.85.4 7.0 8.4 8.3 X 0.3133 0.3142 0.3142 0.3150 0.3142 0.3199 0.32140.3185 Y 0.3455 0.3470 0.3468 0.3472 0.3464 0.3481 0.3512 0.3528Dominant Wavelength 542.0 547.1 547.7 549.6 547.7 569.4 570.9 554.6 (nm)% Purity 3.9 4.7 4.7 5.0 4.6 7.1 8.6 7.5

TABLE 9 70 65 66 67 68 69 Ilmenite 71 72 % Fe₂O₃ 0.825 0.825 0.825 0.8250.825 0.825 0.730 0.730 % Carbon 0.040 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.0390.060 0.069 % TiO₂ 1.60 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.30 1.40 0.80 0.60 % CeO₂ 0.500.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.70 1.00 % CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.00500.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 % Ferrous 22.3 20.0 21.9 19.9 19.7 23.8 25.225.6 Thickness (mm) 3.50 3.55 3.55 3.43 3.53 3.56 3.98 3.84 % Tuv(iso9050 v1990) 5.8 10.4 9.0 8.9 8.3 7.4 9.0 9.2 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003)7.2 12.9 11.1 11.1 10.4 9.2 11.3 11.5 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 15.9 24.8 22.122.8 20.2 18.5 22.2 23.7 % TL_(A) 70.6 76.8 75.0 76.5 74.6 72.6 72.374.2 % Ts (iso 13837) 47.9 53.4 50.7 53.8 51.8 47.4 47.3 50.2 X 63.870.2 68.2 69.8 67.8 65.9 66.0 68.0 Y 70.8 77.3 75.4 76.7 74.7 73.0 73.275.1 Z 63.0 73.2 70.0 71.0 68.2 67.0 70.5 73.5 L* 87.4 90.4 89.6 90.289.2 88.4 88.6 89.4 a* −7.4 −6.5 −7.0 −6.2 −6.4 −7.3 −7.6 −6.7 b* 10.87.4 8.5 8.8 9.5 9.1 6.4 5.5 X 0.3230 0.3180 0.3193 0.3208 0.3220 0.32000.3146 0.3141 Y 0.3582 0.3501 0.3528 0.3526 0.3544 0.3544 0.3491 0.3465Dominant Wavelength 567.9 554.8 558.1 566.8 568.9 559.6 548.9 546.9 (nm)% Purity 11.1 6.6 8.0 8.8 9.8 8.7 5.5 4.6

TABLE 10 73 74 75 76 % Fe₂O₃ 0.825 0.825 0.730 0.825 % Carbon 0.0400.037 0.060 0.040 % TiO₂ 1.40 1.30 0.80 1.40 % CeO₂ 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.50% CuO 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 % Ferrous 23.4 20.3 28.1 22.9Thickness (mm) 3.97 3.92 3.05 3.14 % Tuv (iso9050 v1990) 7.6 8.2 11.711.4 % Tuv (iso9050 v2003) 9.5 10.2 14.6 14.2 % Tuv (Iso 13837) 8.7 19.926.5 25.0 % TL_(A) 71.6 72.8 75.0 76.1 % Ts (Iso 13837) 45.6 49.0 51.852.9 X 64.7 66.0 68.9 69.6 Y 72.1 73.0 75.8 76.5 Z 65.7 66.8 74.7 72.7L* 88.0 88.5 89.8 90.1 a* −8.1 −7.0 −6.5 −6.3 b* 9.5 9.3 5.1 7.2 X0.3195 0.3208 0.3140 0.3180 Y 0.3559 0.3547 0.3456 0.3496 DominantWavelength (nm) 554.9 563.6 546.0 554.9 % Purity 8.6 9.3 4.2 6.5

The examples 1 to 8 show the oxidizing effect of CeO₂ and ferrousbalance to different concentration of C.

In examples 9 to 18, the concentration of C is optimized and the levelsof ferrous from are adjusted from 20 to 30%.

Examples 19 to 31. Concentrations of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂ and C are optimized forthermal performance at 4.8 mm. CuO is added to deduct yellowish tintthat gives the addiction of CeO for its oxidizing effect.

Examples 32 to 54. Due to the high cost of CeO, as a cheaper alternativeto reduce the UV transmittance, TiO₂ is added; a higher concentration ofthis oxide increases the yellowish hue which is reduced with addition ofCuO. The level of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂ and C are optimized in order to obtain athermal performance at 4.8 mm.

Examples 55 to 69. Due to the high cost of CeO, as a cheaper alternativeto reduce the UV transmittance, TiO₂ is added; a higher concentration ofthis oxide increases the yellowish hue which is reduced with addition ofCuO. The level of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂ and C are optimized in order to obtain athermal performance at 3.50 mm.

As alternative raw material for the manufacture of the glass compositionTiO₂ can be substituted by cheaper Ilmenite(FeTiO₃), as is showed inexample 70. Examples 71 to 74. Due to the high cost of CeO, as a cheaperalternative to reduce the UV transmittance, TiO₂ is added; a higherconcentration of this oxide increases the yellowish hue which is reducedwith addition of CuO. The level of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂ and C are optimized inorder to obtain a thermal performance at 4.0 mm.

Examples 75 to 76. Due to the high cost of CeO, as a cheaper alternativeto reduce the UV transmittance, TiO₂ is added; a higher concentration ofthis oxide increases the yellowish hue which is reduced with addition ofCuO. The level of Fe₂O₃, CeO₂ and C are optimized in order to obtain athermal performance at 3.1 mm.

From the above, a green glass composition has been described and willapparent for the experts in the art that many other features orimprovements can be made, which can be considered within the scopedetermined by the following claims:

We claim:
 1. An UV absorbent green solar control glass compositioncomprising a base glass composition and a colorant portion, in weight,wherein the colorant portion comprises: from 0.50 to 1.30% of total ironexpressed as Fe₂O₃; from 0.12 to 0.450% of FeO expressed as Fe₂O₃; fromabout 0.04 to 1.8% selected from TiO₂ or FeTiO₃; about 0.2 to 2% CeO₂;about 0.0004 to 0.015% CuO; and about 0.01 to 0.1% C, wherein the glasscomposition having an illuminant “A” light transmission (TLA) greater of70%, a total solar energy transmittance (Ts ISO13837) of less than orequal to 60%, a solar ultraviolet transmittance (Tuv ISO9050 v1990) ofless than 15%, a dominant wavelength from 485 nm to 570 nm, andexcitation purity of less than 11, at a thickness of 3 to 5 mm.
 2. TheUV absorbent green solar control glass composition of claim 1, whereinthe glass composition has a redox value (FeO/Total Fe₂O₃) from 8% wt. to35% wt.
 3. The UV absorbent green solar control glass composition ofclaim 1, wherein the glass, for a thickness of 3 to 5 mm, has a colorcharacterized as follows when measured according to CIE: a* from −10.9to −3.7 b* from −0.3 to +10.8.
 4. The UV absorbent green solar controlglass composition of claim 1, wherein the base glass compositioncomprises: SiO₂ 70 to 75 Al₂O₃ 0 to 2 CaO  5 to 10 MgO 2.1 to 5   Na₂O10 to 15 K₂O 0 to 3 SO₃ 0.10 to 0.25


5. The UV absorbent green solar control glass composition of claim 4,wherein the glass, for the thickness of 3 to 5 mm, has a colorcharacterized as follows when measured according to CIE: a* from −10.9to −3.7 b* from −0.3 to +10.8.
 6. An UV absorbent green solar controlglass composition comprising a base glass composition and a colorantportion, in weight, wherein the colorant portion consisting essentiallyof: from 0.50 to 1.30% of total iron expressed as Fe₂O₃; from 0.12 to0.450% of FeO expressed as Fe₂O₃; from about 0.04 to 1.8 wt. % TiO₂;about 0.2 to 2% wt CeO₂; about 0.0004 to 0.015 wt. % CuO; and about 0.01to 0.1% C, wherein the glass composition having an illuminant “A” lighttransmission (TLA) greater of 70%, a total solar energy transmittance(Ts ISO13837) of less than or equal to 60%, a solar ultraviolettransmittance (Tuv ISO9050 v1990) of less than 15%, a dominantwavelength from 485 nm to 570 nm, and excitation purity of less than 11,wherein the redox value of the composition ranges is from 8% wt. to 35%weight at a thickness from 3 to 5 mm.